While differences in things like food preferences, TV station preferences, etc. used to be addressed with easily, they can turn into conflicts during difficult times. Conversations about delicate subjects like politics, racism, religion, and religious intolerance may come up at these times as well. And navigating them can be difficult for any relationship.
It can be awkward to learn that your views and beliefs are different from those of others you care about, and frequently the first response is to question and correct the other person.
(Photo from istock)
Following are a few points to prevent ideological conflicts:
Conflicts stem from the righteousness-based entitlement mentality. Children believe their parents to be traditional, while parents believe they are naïve. Is it possible to engage in productive negotiations?
Finding a concession that is advantageous to us while being inexpensive for our opponent to accept is a key skill in negotiations, according to Negotiations 101. In my most recent study, which was published in the Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. I discuss how, in ideological conflicts, proactively affirming the status of those who don’t share your moral beliefs. May help you work together more successfully and get through tense, challenging situations.
Respect children as unique beings
Children acquire their own knowledge, experiences, attitudes, and beliefs as they mature. In addition to family, there are numerous additional factors that affect a person’s uniqueness. That frequently might not be in line with you, and that’s all well. Children may, for instance, hold distinct political philosophies than their parents.
Try to Have a Positive Conversation
Recognize one another’s viewpoints. This can also be a useful activity to get to know one another better. Which will improve your ability to get along with one another. Examine whether a solution to the dispute or a mutually acceptable compromise is possible.
Disagreeing won’t harm
The most common survival tool is this one. Pay attention, nod your head, then go. For instance, some family members might think it is useless to clatter plates or light candles, whereas other family members might find value in it. Let everyone pursue their own interests. Only facts and reasoning should be used to resolve some issues.
The case for stupidity cannot be made
One family member, for instance, should be reminded of their duty. And how their actions may endanger others if they are constantly anxious about leaving the house or handling the situation carelessly.
Recognize how authority can be abused
Although forcibly imposing one’s beliefs can be satisfying, it is frequently discovered to be bad for the partnership. Personal egos and insane arguments are reserved for after the quarantine. For. e. g. Teenagers’ self-esteem may be impacted if you give them the impression that their views are foolish. Conversely, if your adolescent chooses to back a cause that runs against to your political ideals, don’t force your views on them.
If the talk turns tense, stop and take a break
Better yet, walk away from the conflict. Losing your minds to one another, particularly when you are compelled to live together under one roof, can lead to unpleasantness and make life difficult for everyone who shares the area.
Understanding ideology of conflicts
Conflict is important to ideology. Common convictions define the objects of animosity, provide a group a feeling of identity, and allow for coordinated action. The secret to efficient conflict management and resolution is understanding ideology. Yet it hasn’t been well understood up until now. It is assumed to be something abstract or irrational, and it is better ignored in the quest for explicative and remedial concreteness.
Sincerity is demanded to prevent conflicts
You must identify a quality about the individual you really admire. Recognize their dedication and passion, for example, or their abilities in a field entirely unrelated to the one with which you disagree, as Sarah did when she praised Kevin for his tact with the dissatisfied client.
Specification will help
Status confirmation comes as a surprise and could be seen with suspicion. It would have been less convincing and credible if Sarah had praised Kevin’s client contacts in general rather than what he accomplished in that particular circumstance.
(Photo from istock)
Your provocation is crucial
Prior to entering into discussions or situations when you require your opponents’ assistance, be proactive by stating your status. The strategy would have been less effective if Sarah had praised Kevin’s handling of the client situation before he left for the meeting to talk about her promotion.
Mere respect can fall short
Despite the fact that many people instinctively show respect to others when they are engaged in disputes or negotiations, status affirmation is most effective when your opponent gets what they truly want, satisfying an unspoken, underlying desire for status and respect rather than just making empty statements. As a result, express genuine respect in advance without attempting to persuade your opponents to compromise their moral principles.
Status affirmation, as I refer to it, entails more than just being polite or expressing one’s disagreement with another. It’s about gratifying people’s innate, universal need to be respected and, barring exceptional circumstances, to generally rise in social standing over time.
Suppose Sarah and Kevin, two co-workers at a pharmaceutical company, have different opinions on Obamacare. Kevin is adamant that the legislation is an unacceptable government intrusion into people’s most private affairs, while Sarah is convinced that it was a necessary instrument to reform our failing healthcare system. They constantly disagree because of their divergent ideologies, which affects many facets of their working relationship. Sarah anticipates Kevin to decline a promotion she has applied for as a result.